Comments on: Discussion: Google Must Be Close to Indexing Video Content http://www.schneidermike.com/technology/discussion-google-must-be-close-to-indexing-video-content/59/ a blog about technology and analysis Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:45:18 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: themichaelschneider http://www.schneidermike.com/technology/discussion-google-must-be-close-to-indexing-video-content/59/comment-page-1/#comment-248 themichaelschneider Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:06:21 +0000 http://www.themichaelschneider.com/?p=59#comment-248 Hah! Sweet validation! I knew it. Thanks for weighing in Chris. Hah! Sweet validation! I knew it. Thanks for weighing in Chris.

]]> By: Chris Brogan... http://www.schneidermike.com/technology/discussion-google-must-be-close-to-indexing-video-content/59/comment-page-1/#comment-125 Chris Brogan... Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:15:20 +0000 http://www.themichaelschneider.com/?p=59#comment-125 You know that GOOG-411 is a big voice-training software, right? Further, you've heard of http://everyzing.com , true? There are LOTS of speech-rec services that can catalog the audio stream of a video. There are pattern-rec and visual-rec softwares already leaking into the mainstream that can track faces, certain keyed objects, etc. They're doing it. It's just not ready for beta. : ) You know that GOOG-411 is a big voice-training software, right? Further, you’ve heard of http://everyzing.com , true? There are LOTS of speech-rec services that can catalog the audio stream of a video. There are pattern-rec and visual-rec softwares already leaking into the mainstream that can track faces, certain keyed objects, etc.

They’re doing it. It’s just not ready for beta. : )

]]> By: Chris Brogan... http://www.schneidermike.com/technology/discussion-google-must-be-close-to-indexing-video-content/59/comment-page-1/#comment-224 Chris Brogan... Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:15:20 +0000 http://www.themichaelschneider.com/?p=59#comment-224 You know that GOOG-411 is a big voice-training software, right? Further, you've heard of <a href="http://everyzing.com">http://everyzing.com</a> , true? There are LOTS of speech-rec services that can catalog the audio stream of a video. There are pattern-rec and visual-rec softwares already leaking into the mainstream that can track faces, certain keyed objects, etc. <br><br>They're doing it. It's just not ready for beta. : ) You know that GOOG-411 is a big voice-training software, right? Further, you've heard of http://everyzing.com , true? There are LOTS of speech-rec services that can catalog the audio stream of a video. There are pattern-rec and visual-rec softwares already leaking into the mainstream that can track faces, certain keyed objects, etc.

They're doing it. It's just not ready for beta. : )

]]> By: Charles Eichenbaum http://www.schneidermike.com/technology/discussion-google-must-be-close-to-indexing-video-content/59/comment-page-1/#comment-121 Charles Eichenbaum Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:28:52 +0000 http://www.themichaelschneider.com/?p=59#comment-121 There are probably certain elements of human speech that can be keyed in on (cadence, dynamic modulation, individual’s tone) that differ from ambient noise and music. This might help them isolate the spoken parts of the videos – which in turn might allow them to convert the text to speech and index. They could even try to catalog all known / published video media and try to create some Shazam style identifier to further ID the content (is this “Dude Where’s My Car,” or “amateur” video).I bet you’re right. There are probably certain elements of human speech that can be keyed in on (cadence, dynamic modulation, individual’s tone) that differ from ambient noise and music. This might help them isolate the spoken parts of the videos – which in turn might allow them to convert the text to speech and index. They could even try to catalog all known / published video media and try to create some Shazam style identifier to further ID the content (is this “Dude Where’s My Car,” or “amateur” video).I bet you’re right.

]]> By: Charles Eichenbaum http://www.schneidermike.com/technology/discussion-google-must-be-close-to-indexing-video-content/59/comment-page-1/#comment-223 Charles Eichenbaum Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:28:52 +0000 http://www.themichaelschneider.com/?p=59#comment-223 There are probably certain elements of human speech that can be keyed in on (cadence, dynamic modulation, individual’s tone) that differ from ambient noise and music. This might help them isolate the spoken parts of the videos – which in turn might allow them to convert the text to speech and index. They could even try to catalog all known / published video media and try to create some Shazam style identifier to further ID the content (is this “Dude Where’s My Car,” or “amateur” video).I bet you’re right. There are probably certain elements of human speech that can be keyed in on (cadence, dynamic modulation, individual’s tone) that differ from ambient noise and music. This might help them isolate the spoken parts of the videos – which in turn might allow them to convert the text to speech and index. They could even try to catalog all known / published video media and try to create some Shazam style identifier to further ID the content (is this “Dude Where’s My Car,” or “amateur” video).I bet you’re right.

]]>