<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Media and Technology Blog Boston by SchneiderMike &#187; revenue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schneidermike.com/tag/revenue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schneidermike.com</link>
	<description>a blog about technology and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:14:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hey Nanoblogs. What About the Money?</title>
		<link>http://www.schneidermike.com/technology/hey-nanoblogs-what-about-the-money/29/</link>
		<comments>http://www.schneidermike.com/technology/hey-nanoblogs-what-about-the-money/29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>schneidermike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themichaelschneider.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We rely on the Internet to do everything from communicating with our friends, families and colleagues to choosing a new cappucino maker. A good deal of the technology we provided for your webbing enjoyment is free, but supported software with guaranteed uptime generally does not exist without a revenue model (for long).  Companies like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.themichaelschneider.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/nano_blog_revenue.gif" style="align: left;" />We rely on the Internet to do everything from communicating with our friends, families and colleagues to choosing a new cappucino maker. A good deal of the technology we provided for your webbing enjoyment is free, but supported software with guaranteed uptime generally does not exist without a revenue model (for long).  Companies like Yahoo! and Google provide us with oodles of free tools without so much as having to say &#8220;Oh Toodles&#8221;. We know the juggernaut model. They sell ads and they roll in dough. So when people complain about Yahoo or Google tools being down, I am sympathetic because whether the notice it or not, those companies are earning money by having you as a user. But what about those that do not have a revenue model to speak of?<span id="more-29"></span></p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VVNaWdvU6wE&#038;hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VVNaWdvU6wE&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>My current foray into the Social Media space/phenomenon has been infinitely satisfying primarily due to a seemingly endless array of questions that need answers and what seems to be a daily tasty new software snack tossing itself into the fray.  One thing I have noticed is that when people find a new piece of social media ware, they enjoy sharing it with their online communities.  It feels a lot like they are pioneers moving into a land and staking claim on it as if it were their own. Each new Social Conquistador exhibits newfound passion and instant evangelism along with a sense of ownership. You also hear them bring the thunder and lightning when the stuff is down. Look at Twitter for instance. You don&#8217;t have to take my word for it, <a href="http://summize.com/search?q=twitter+down+sucks">just look at all of the complaints about how badly Twitter sucks.</a></p>
<p>But are they even entitled to act like that?  Twitter does not have any revenue model that I can detect. Unless&#8230; maybe the revenue model is not transparent. Let&#8217;s look at the possibilities:</p>
<ul>
<li>Charge subscription fee. That would be an <a href="http://failblog.org/2008/06/02/almost-epic-fail/">epic fail</a>. Want to see everyone run to Plurk?</li>
<li>Sell Ads. I would think this would be part of implementation on day 1. You gotta eat and your angels and VC backers will only feed you for so long.</li>
<li>Sell out to Google, Yahoo or Microsoft</li>
</ul>
<p>I guess they&#8217;re hoping to be bought.  It worked for Jaiku!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schneidermike.com/technology/hey-nanoblogs-what-about-the-money/29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
